Sponsors
Currently Reading
-
Categories
Terms

The Book Lady's Blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Reviews and articles posted here are property of The Book Lady's Blog and are not to be posted elsewhere without permission. Please contact me if you wish to post any of my work, or any excerpt thereof, in any other location or format.
Jun
20
An Interview with John Milliken Thompson (THE RESERVOIR)
2011 at 5am Posted by Rebecca Schinsky
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed, so you won't miss any of the bookish goodness. Thanks for visiting!
John Milliken Thompson’s debut novel The Reservoir is out this week from Other Press, and I had the pleasure of interviewing him in anticipation of his launch party tomorrow night at Fountain Bookstore.
The Reservoir is based on a real murder trial. How did you discover it?
A paragraph in Virginius Dabney’s Richmond: The Story of a City got me on the trail of this 126-year-old case.
Were you looking for a book idea, or did the book idea grow out of discovering the case?
I’m always looking for and open to book ideas, but really I was just interested at that point in learning more about Richmond. I played around for a while with doing some kind of nonfiction book on the case, but I became so engrossed with the story I decided to try writing it as a novel.
You’ve written extensively about American history. Why make the move to fiction for this story?
Continuing from the previous question, the story wasn’t working for me as straight nonfiction. I was having a hard time probing deep enough into the characters to make the story anything more than an interesting local incident. I had a feeling that the only way to really get at the characters and their motivations, and to give the story more universal meaning, was through fiction, which allows and requires the imagination to go beyond the available facts. The characters’ thoughts, words, and actions, then, became the story, with the real case providing a rough outline.
Interview with MR. PEANUT author Adam Ross
2010 at 5am Posted by Rebecca Schinsky
I’ve made no secret of my near-obsession with Adam Ross’s debut novel Mr. Peanut—which I have now read twice (once in manuscript form and once in final copy)—and my plans to throw panties at Mr. Ross at the first opportunity. I was thrilled when he agreed to do a Q & A that would pull back the curtain and give readers a peek into the editorial process and the mind that created this incredibly complex and multi-layered novel. The fact that my friend Josh Christie (Brews and Books), who first recommended the novel to me, joined me for the interview made it all the better. Mr. Peanut is utterly unforgettable, and the writing is genius, and this, my friends, is just a little taste. You’ll find the second half of the interview at Josh’s blog this afternoon.

Mr. Peanut has a pretty labyrinthine plot, with point-of-view and the chronology of events jumping all over the place. When you were plotting the book, did you plan everything for the characters one at a time from start to finish, or did you jump around?
AR: The short answer is no, I didn’t plan or plot things out at first. Large chunks of the novel were written out of sequence, a method Nabokov used. He was very methodical in this unconsecutive approach—he wrote his novels on index cards, writing scenes and set pieces out of order and then placing them in a shoe box front to back—though I’ve adopted it more consciously now.
When I began drafting, it was more of an inspirational plunge. My father told me about the death of my second cousin, her suspicious suicide that her husband witnessed—or the murder he perpetrated—that exactly mirrors Alice’s murder/suicide in the novel, and in a single sitting I wrote three chapters that very closely resemble what’s in the book now. I didn’t know what I was doing on a macro level but almost immediately knew the novel’s last line (like a lodestar, it gave me direction during the whole journey) and I did think those initial pages had drive, so I wanted to keep building on them. Also, if you’re going to write a novel that plays with chronology or loops away from the central plot, well, those digressions better be tour de force stuff or else you’ll lose the reader, so in momentum and inspiration I trusted. Read more
Ask Neil White, author of In the Sanctuary of Outcasts
2009 at 8am Posted by Rebecca Schinsky
Last week, I read and raved about Neil White’s memoir In the Sanctuary of Outcasts, which chronicles the year he spent at a prison that also served as America’s last leprosarium. During an email exchange, I mentioned that I’d like to have him write a guest post, then we decided it would be more fun to do a non-traditional interview and open up the floor to questions.
So, what do you want to know?
There’s plenty to ask about—Neil was a successful publisher before he was convicted of bank fraud, he met some real characters during his time in prison, and the lessons he learned from a few of the leprosy patients are touching and unforgettable.
Whether you’ve read In the Sanctuary of Outcasts or not (if you haven’t, you can read a chapter here), your questions are welcome. So, ask away! I’ll keep the comments open for a week or so and will submit your questions to Neil for response.
Read other reviews at:
Interview with Jim Beaver, author of Life’s That Way
2009 at 8am Posted by Rebecca Schinsky

You might remember my gushing about Life’s That Way, Jim Beaver’s memoir of the year his wife Cecily was diagnosed with and died of lung cancer. Life’s That Way is one of the most affecting, unforgettable books I’ve read, and I was thrilled to have the opportunity to interview Jim.
But I couldn’t imagine what I would ask him that wouldn’t be too personal or trite and that would be, well, good enough for a book of this quality. Lucky for me, Kathy from Bermuda Onion was having the same problem, so we put our heads together and decided to do a co-interview. Here are our questions and Jim’s responses.
The thoughts and fears you shared in your nightly emails were intensely personal. How and why did you decide to publish them?
I was, in fact, initially quite reluctant to publish the emails in book form. Despite the fact that several thousand people had read each of them originally, it seemed somehow too private a thing to consider putting into a book. But a steady stream of encouragement from people who had followed the emails went a long way toward convincing me. Finally, though, I think it was a conversation with a friend that turned the tide for me. She told me that 25 years earlier, she had lost her husband and son within six weeks, and that she’d shut down so much in the aftermath that she had never shared her feelings with anyone. She said that after reading my journal, she had decided to open up about her own grief and that the results were so comforting, so positively affecting that she felt her life radically changed for the better. After hearing that, I thought that I simply had to follow through with what so many folks were encouraging me to do. A not inconsiderable factor, too, was the great joy I took in the prospect of introducing my wonderful wife Cecily to a world of people who’d missed out on the chance to know her.
Not really. To me, there is something unrealistically “safe”-feeling about typing and hitting “send.” In fact, I felt much safer about the “strangers” who were reading my nightly emails than I did about some of the friends and family members. I’ve always had an ability, in the right circumstances, to sort of bare my chest and say, “Here I am, take it or leave it,” though I assure you it’s not that way most of the time. I’m a very shy and self-protective person most of the time, but when it comes to revealing my heart, it’s often very easy to do. I can’t even always predict what circumstances are required, but many times in my life I’ve surprised myself by spilling my feelings even to a stranger. I don’t think I ever hesitated or regretted hitting “send,” simply because I had always worked out what I would or wouldn’t say beforehand, and I think if I had negative things to say about others, I was able to temper those before sending them out. I rarely felt compelled to temper negative things about myself, though. As I say in the book, what’s the point of having truth if you’re not going to tell it?
As I expected, the response has been invariably positive and supportive. There seems to be a great sense of relief and achievement that I’ve finally done this thing and that it’s out there. Of course, many people who were intricately involved in the story have found the events too painful to revisit, but even they are recommending the book and buying it for friends. But I’ve actually been surprised by the number of people who were readers of the original emails who have bought and read the book. It never really occurred to me that any of them would. The book was intended for those who hadn’t been along on the original journey. I must say that the response from both “old” and new readers has been astounding and deeply, deeply moving.
Maddie is doing wonderfully well now. She is currently going through some emotional issues that relate, I think, to her growing maturity and thus to her growing understanding of the meaning of the loss of her mother. It’s not an easy time for her. But she is in a mainstream school, and is a charming and social and bright, witty kid. She’s only 7 now, so it seems very early to share the substance of the book with her, though I don’t hide it. In fact, she picked it up the other day and asked if she could read it. I hesitated only a moment before saying yes. She read a couple of pages and then put it down in favor of a Junie B. Jones book. Eventually she will be old enough and mature enough to discover those events through the book and through the letters her mother left her. I can’t guess when that will be, but I suspect she will let me know when it’s time.
Be present, but don’t try to “fix” their grief. Explaining why things aren’t so bad (“At least you still have your child” or “He’s in a better place”) or recommending “remedies” (“You just need to keep busy” or “Give it time”) do nothing but prolong and exacerbate pain. Don’t tell your friend “I know how you feel,” and don’t compare griefs (“I know it’s bad, because I lost my mom, too”). Everyone grieves individually, uniquely, and no matter how similar circumstances might seem, grieving people do not, as a rule, want to think their own grief is just like anybody else’s. For a time, it is singular and special and personal, and cannot be lightened by explanations or advice or comparisons. Just be present. Admit to not knowing what to say (no one knows what to say, not even the person grieving). Be there. Let it be known you are there and available. Listen. Don’t advise. Listen. If you don’t own a time machine and a cure for disease or age or misfortune, don’t presume to think you can fix someone’s grief. The greatest gift you can give is to be there, supportive, silent, and emotionally available.
In LIFE’S THAT WAY, you occasionally discuss your creative process and the outlets you find in acting and writing. Do you prefer one over the other? Why?
I much prefer acting to writing, simply because writing is hard, hard work, and acting, while I work hard at it, is fun. I love writing, don’t get me wrong. But it’s tough and I’m not well-disciplined, and I weary of the work far too quickly. What I found during the writing of these emails and their transcription into this book is that writing can be enormously cathartic and can provide a catalyst for deeper understanding of oneself. That was invaluable to me, and I recommend it, not just to people going through difficulty, but to anyone who wants to have a greater sense of self and of one’s place in the human community. But the emails were pure self-expression, and in a strange way, they were much easier than making up fiction. I still write and probably always will. But acting is and shall always remain, I suspect, my one great love.
I have two books I was working on long before this one came to pass. I have been researching for many years, between acting jobs and personal speed bumps, a biography of 1950s TV Superman, George Reeves, and I dearly hope to see it finished. I also have part of a novel, a piece of crime fiction that I hope pushes the boundaries of the genre. And since Life’s That Way, I’ve had professional encouragement to attempt another sort of novel, and I am slowly piecing that possibility together in my mind. But filming a TV series involves pre-dawn to late-night workdays, and I don’t seem to get much done while I’m filming. So predicting a completion of any of these projects is an iffy proposition at best.
Special thanks to Jim Beaver for taking the time to answer our questions and Kate at Folio Literary Management for arranging the interview. Click here to read more about LIFE’S THAT WAY.
Copyright secured by Digiprove © 2010 Rebecca Schinsky
An Interview with Christopher Meeks
2009 at 3pm Posted by Rebecca Schinsky


I recently had the pleasure of reading and reviewing Christopher Meeks’s debut novel The Brightest Moon of the Century. I loved it, so I was thrilled when Chris (who, by the way, is always very pleasant and generous) agreed to answer a few of my questions.
Throughout the book, Edward wrestles with experiences, questions, and struggles that we all face one way or another. His teenage years are a particularly vivid example of universal experiences and awkwardness. I recognized many of my own experiences in the pages of The Brightest Moon…how much of your own experience informed these? Is anything totally invented?
This book will be the most autobiographical one I’ll ever do. I chewed through the landscape of my life, especially those early years of growing up in Minnesota, attending college at the University of Denver, working at a camera store in Los Angeles, and, yes, arriving at a trailer park in Alabama where I had moved with a friend.
I take Tim O’Brien’s idea of story, which he explains in his book, The Things They Carried. He notes the difference between “happening truth,” which is the way things happened in life, and “story truth,” which is how you the author change things, often molding events to get to the deeper truth of how things had really felt. Thus, my mother did not die (she’s still alive), and the father in the novel is more an amalgam of my father, George, and my stepfather, Phil. Still, all of us feel lonely at one time or another, so making that clearer for Edward was important.
While I experienced Hurricane Frederick in 1979, no tornados ripped through the park, nor did an airplane crash into my trailer. It seemed darkly funny to me, however, to have those things happen. Trailer parks seem to be magnets for natural disasters.
Nothing is totally invented, but things are certainly pushed. I include a few photos in the book to echo the reality of the settings, but some of the specific events are invented to underscore Edward’s character. Each of the nine chapters are informed, however, by events in my life.
Talk about your writing process with The Brightest Moon. How was writing it similar to and different from creating your short story collections?
I had an agent interested in representing me, but he kept saying, “Write a novel.” I was trying to convince him at the time of his taking my manuscript of The Middle-Aged Man and the Sea to publishers. He said, “No. There’s no money in short fiction. Write a novel.” A novel was simply too intimidating to me. I’d written a bad one in grad school, and so I learned first hand what a wild horse the form can be. It’s hard to control or even see. Still, I felt so close to landing an agent that maybe I should give a novel a try again.
Once I decided to write a novel and came up with a starting point, I stopped. The task felt like climbing Mt. Everest while being afraid of heights and having only a few tools. When I mentioned to a writer friend my fears, he said, “Write each chapter as if it’s a short story. You know how to write those. Just keep the same protagonist in each. You’ll do fine.”
I smiled. That seemed easy enough. One of my favorite books, The Girls Guide to Hunting and Fishing by Melissa Bank, was written that way, so I gave myself permission to write this way. When I finished three chapters-separate stories-I sent them to the agent, who was impressed. He said if I kept it up, I’d have a novel that he could represent. He suggested the idea of writing the year at the start of each chapter.
That’s the way the first draft came about. I had more than a dozen story-chapters originally. One or two I didn’t like and removed. I expanded the college and Alabama sections, dividing them into “Parts,” because the story there just needed “more.”
I didn’t want this to be another short story collection, and as I worked on it more, I added foreshadowing, an important ingredient in novels that’s hard to include in a first draft. You have to know your story well before you can foreshadow, so that’s something that comes later. Over the years, before and after I wrote drafts of two other novels, I went back to this novel to rewrite and interweave the chapters more.
That first agent signed me on, but he didn’t like my calling him every month to ask him how things were going. To occupy myself, I went and wrote a second novel and never called until I finished that novel. I then learned he had forgotten to send out the first because I hadn’t bugged him.
I looked for a new agent and found one, one who happily takes my calls. Jim McCarthy at Dystel and Goderich Literary Management in New York signed me based on my second novel, not this one. When I showed him this one, he wanted to go out with my second one and felt this one was perhaps too long. Last year, I took out two chapters from The Brightest Moon and worked with my editor to tighten it more. Thus, I removed about a hundred pages, which made it better.
After the advanced reading copies (ARCs) went out to reviewers, I read the ARC as if I were a casual book reader. That is, I read it trying to imagine it if I hadn’t written it. The Alabama section needed tweaking. I found a new beginning to that chapter that heightened Edward’s confusion about his future, and I condensed two scenes, and the section felt right. I added the photos, too, after I’d loved the handful of photos in Sara Gruen’s Water for Elephants, a novel about a vet in a traveling circus in the Great Depression.
How long did it take to complete The Brightest Moon from inception to publication?
Ten years. This novel was a huge experiment for me.
When you asked this question, my instant response was it took five years. However, I just looked in my letters file, and I see I had the conversation with the first agent in 1999. I have a letter dated October 11, 1999 saying that I was now thinking of the novel, but could he show my manuscript of short fiction? He encouraged me to write the novel and forget the book of short fiction.
That year, 1999, I’d read about the brightest moon of the century being on December 21, 1999. I cut out that article about it.
By the way, I didn’t listen to the agent about the short fiction. The Middle-Aged Man and the Sea came out in December 2005, six years after I’d asked him to send it out, and when the review of the book appeared in the Los Angeles Times on January 2, 2006, he called up and congratulated me, saying I’d been right to go ahead with it.
I would come back to The Brightest Moon of the Century every few years until this one felt ready at last.
I’m glad I didn’t think about this until now. If I thought about the time spent along the way, I might have thought writing was hopeless.
Taking a page from Edward’s book, please tell us about an embarrassing/awkward memory of your own teenage years.
I used up many of those memories in the book, but there are certainly hundreds of others. Luckily, when we’re in our teenager years, we don’t realize how clueless we really are. Also, it’s amazing how most of us survive. A friend’s older brother thought it was funny trying to scare us by driving close to the edge of a swamp back and forth. Of course, he was encouraged by our laughter-until the car ended up in the swamp and we had to flee. In Minnesota, the lakes freeze so hard, you can drive on them. One spring as my friends and I were in a car on the lake-probably the last weekend it would be safe-we saw a way off the lake that took us through melted water. We raced for the edge to have momentum-and we shot through with an amazing spray. The ice was still strong enough underneath. We could have been a sad story on the news, though. Teenagers don’t see themselves as mortal.
We overdrank in those years, too. What else was there to do in Minnesota? When I turned eighteen, the drinking age lowered to eighteen. By then, though, alcohol had little appeal to me. It didn’t seem fun or funny to me anymore.
If the adult Edward at the end of the book could go back and tell his teenaged self one thing, what would it be?
Don’t worry. Be happy.
Any weird author quirks or writing habits you care to share? Do you have a particular writing routine?
I’m not sure why people think authors or artists are particularly quirky. Everyone is. Anyone who has lived with anyone else for a while (think of your spouse, for instance) discovers incredible quirks.
In my Freshman English class at Santa Monica College, we just finished reading The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark Haddon. It’s written from the point of view of a young man with Asperger’s Syndrome, which may be the epitome of quirkiness. For one assignment, I had my students write a scene from their lives in the style of the main character. What I loved about this assignment is they all found some quirk of their own and wrote about it matter-of-factly. One young woman, for instance, wrote about her fear of spiders as if, of course, spiders should be feared, and it’s natural to sleep on the couch for two weeks after she saw a spider in her bedroom before realizing that the single spider she saw might be hatching eggs and the whole room should be scrubbed with bleach and everything washable washed.
We’re all funny people, which is something I love to write about. Life has many absurdities.
I try to write every day, even if for just twenty minutes. If you write at the same desk at the same time daily, you’ll pick up from where you left off.
Finally, please tell us a bit about what you’re working on now. When can we expect another novel?
Now that I ran out of novels based on my life, I’ve looked outside myself. I’m writing a mystery. While I haven’t been a rabid mystery reader, I’m often in awe of good mysteries, such as The Two-Minute Rule by Robert Crais or nearly anything by Michael Connelly. I aspire to something along the lines of Raymond Chandler or Dashiell Hammett, but instead of creating a hard-boiled detective loner, I can’t help it: life’s absurdities are sneaking in.
I’m learning a lot, and we’ll see if I pull it off, a balance between a strong plot and an “everyman” character whose needs and realizations make him interesting. I appreciate how good mystery writers make a novel a page-turner, and yet the protagonist can surprise us with his or her contradictions. My novel starts in Las Vegas with a murder, and my protagonist, a home-and-garden businessman at a trade show, is pulled in as the main suspect. He’s innocent but has to find the real murderer when the police don’t think it’s anyone but him.
What I’m working on is my fourth novel. Jim McCarthy, my agent, has two others. If any publisher is reading this, give him a call.
Copyright © 2010 The Book Lady's Blog • Designed by:Simply Amusing Designs














