The Sunday Salon 4.18.10: On Books, Blogs, and Marketing

2010 at 9am     Posted by Rebecca Joines Schinsky

I’ve been stewing about this for a while.  In the last several months, I’ve seen a handful of blog posts with negative statements about marketing and bloggers who “market” their blogs and blog-related projects, and the Twitter conversations about this topic seem endless. It seems that, for a certain subset of the blogging community, “marketing” is a four-letter word, and the bloggers who eschew it are somehow more authentic or noble than those who embrace it.  It also seems that many bloggers don’t really know what they’re talking about when they’re talking about marketing.

Marketing gets a bad rap. People hear “marketing,” and they start thinking about slimy used car salesmen in bad polyester suits.

But here’s the thing: at its core, marketing is simply about creating awareness.

Yes, marketing is often about creating awareness of a product or service, and that awareness is the first step in a strategic plan to get people to buy the product or service (that’s the SALES step, which is different from marketing), but marketing is key. Marketing is about affecting how people think about something, and you have to affect attitudes before you can affect behaviors. (You have to make me aware of the new item on the menu, and you have to affect my attitude about it, before you can get me to buy it.)

But marketing is not always about a product or service. It is not always about leading up to sales.

Marketing is about creating and affecting awareness, and it’s not just businesses who use marketing. Non-profit organizations, charities, schools, etc. all use marketing to make the public aware of them and to affect the public’s perception of them (hopefully in a positive direction) in order to gain support, funding, you know the drill.

And we, all of us who talk about and review books on our blogs, are engaged in marketing every single day.

Sometimes this is obvious, as when we participate in blog tours or review books we receive from publishers as part of the marketing campaign (the effort to create awareness) for a new or forthcoming title. Certainly, we are marketing when we feature guest posts, interviews, and giveaways for books we believe in. That’s one of the benefits of being a blogger and having an audience—we get to throw our weight behind the books and authors we believe in, and WE ALL DO IT. And it’s nothing to be ashamed of. It’s the same idea as sitting down to lunch with a group of your friends and telling them about this book that they just HAVE TO READ (and that’s marketing too, folks) but you’re sitting at a really big table.

What we don’t always acknowledge is that even when we’re reviewing backlist titles, classics, or less well-known books, we are STILL engaging in marketing. The act of posting information about these books—about ANY books—in the public forum of the internet is an act that, by its nature, changes the public’s awareness and perception of them.  If you post about a book that even one person who reads your blog has not previously heard of, or if your review changes even one person’s mind about that book (making them either more or less inclined to read it), you are engaging in marketing. (And yes, even negative reviews are marketing; you are still affecting attitudes about the book, just in the opposite direction than most marketing efforts attempt to.) We may not think of our reviews of backlist and less popular titles as marketing because we’re not posting them in partnership with a publisher, publicist, or author who asked us to do so, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t.

With book blogging, books are most often the product we are marketing (read: creating and affecting awareness for), but that’s not always the case. Sometimes, our blogs are the product. And sometimes, WE are the product.

And that’s where it starts to get hairy. I get it that many people don’t like to think of themselves as products. It can feel icky.

But if you use Twitter, Facebook, Ning, or any social networking site to discuss your blog or your book reviews, you are MARKETING your blog. Even if you just post links to your blog on that site or include your URL in your member profile, you are marketing your blog. When you comment on other blogs (an act that is likely to introduce others to you and your blog), you are marketing. It’s a passive form of marketing—allowing others to discover the link without your directing them to it—but it is still marketing. Your simple presence on something like Twitter is an act of marketing in that it creates a public awareness of you (and often your blog) that would not otherwise exist, and how you interact there continually affect and shape the public’s perception, regardless of whether you’re being strategic in those interactions or not (and, for the record, I think that most of us are not).

If you are a blogger who is also a writer, and you are trying to get published, and you include information about your writing projects on your blog or you discuss them on Twitter, you are marketing yourself as a writer. You are creating awareness of your writing in hopes that it will cause someone to act differently (in this case, by looking at your writing and maybe publishing you). Even if you are not knocking on doors, emailing, or tweeting directly to agents, you are passively creating awareness of your writing and of yourself as a writer, and that’s marketing.

Those of us who participate in blog tours and work with publishers, publicists, and authors to coordinate book reviews and related features are often engaged in the act of marketing ourselves.  We first have to make these publishers, publicists, and authors aware of us (often done passively, just by having a blog that can be found on in the internet, but sometimes more actively by engaging on Twitter, etc.), and then we have to affect how they think about us by writing solid, well-crafted reviews and being reliable. We build relationships with them and hope they come to think of us as the go-to bloggers for specific kinds of books, bloggers who will write honest reviews and present even our negative opinions well.

And guess what?  The way we want to be perceived by the people with whom we interact and cultivate relationships? That’s our personal brand. And WE ALL HAVE ONE (even when it includes a distaste for marketing and branding).

You may not think you have a brand,—and I’ve seen MANY bloggers make disparaging remarks about branding and marketing on Twitter, which, hello, is a PUBLIC FORUM in which you affect how others perceive you— but if you have a public presence anywhere, you have a brand because your presence alone gives people a reason to think about you, and how they think about you—the image you project and the way you are perceived—is your brand.

Even if you do not have an online presence, you have a personal brand. All of us who work in public, who cultivate a professional image, who have relationships within our industries, and  who work to be thought of in a certain way by our peers, have personal brands.

And this is all to say that marketing and branding are not, by their nature, bad things. We all do them all the time, even when we are publicly disparaging the very concepts.

I don’t care what you choose to do with your blog or how you choose to interact on Twitter. I don’t care what kind of image you cultivate or whom you form relationships with. I don’t care whether you work actively to market your blog, yourself, and the books you believe in or if you just post them publicly and allow people to discover them.

I just think it’s high time that we acknowledge what marketing really is (and what it isn’t) and get beyond the naive idea that one can have an online presence without engaging in any form of marketing.

I work in marketing. I like it, I believe in it, and I think it is vitally important to think about how our actions come across in public. But really, I’m just SO OVER hearing people talk about how much they hate marketing and branding when they are having the conversations in VERY public forums and using the conversations to create awareness (hello, marketing) of their dislike for it, which, whether intentionally or not, attracts a certain audience and shapes perceptions. If you’re talking about how much you hate marketing, you’re doing it because you want people to be aware that you hate marketing, and you want to be thought of as someone who doesn’t engage in it. You are marketing your personal brand as someone who is anti-marketing. Oh, the irony…

And, as my mother would say, that’s your little red wagon to pull.

But I’d encourage you to start thinking about it.

You have a brand. That’s a fact. And you can either take control of it or allow other people to shape it for you. This doesn’t mean your interactions need to be calculated and strategic (in fact, I’d argue against that), but it does mean you should spend some time thinking about what your blog means, how you want people to think about it (because they DO think about it), and how you want people to think about you.

Anyone who has a professional life (and being a student DOES count) thinks about (or should think about) these things all the time, and bloggers, whether we hope to use our blogs as a platform to something else or not, should behave professionally if we want to have any hope of gaining legitimacy in the industry and being thought of us real contributors who work, each in our own way, to keep the written word alive.