Reviews and articles posted here are property of The Book Lady's Blog and are not to be posted elsewhere without permission. Please contact me if you wish to post any of my work, or any excerpt thereof, in any other location or format.
I’m going to forgo the “oh my gawd, ya’ll, we’re already 1/12 through 2010″ chat for a few minutes here because, frankly, I need to be in denial about it. February? Already? Sheesh.
So, let’s talk about snow instead. Sometime between Friday night and Saturday morning, Richmond (and most of the rest of the eastern seaboard/mid-Atlantic region) got dumped on. And it is a beautiful thing. Except for the fact that, here in Richmond, people start preparing for snow about five days before its predicted arrival date. By Wednesday, my preferred grocery store was out of my top three coffee choices. By Friday morning, you couldn’t find chili ingredients to save your life….and by Friday afternoon (still 6-10 hours before the snow would start), well, toilet paper had become a hot commodity. Seriously, someone on Facebook actually asked me if I knew of a grocery store that still had TP and then half-joked that I could probably make a killing selling my extra rolls on Craigslist. Oy.
So tell me something. Do people poop more when it snows, or do southerners really think that one good snowfall is going to keep them trapped in their homes for weeks on end? I just don’t get it.
One good thing I learned this weekend, though, is that calories consumed during snowed-in weekends don’t count. In fact, according to my husband (whom I love more for this declaration), they are negative. Which is a good thing, considering that we had Ghirardelli double dark chocolate brownies for breakfast and lunch yesterday, Rice Krispie treats today, and are headed to Chipotle for our traditional end-of-a-snowy-weekend dinner.
Bring on the extra cheese and sour cream.
Anyway, aside from the snow, this has been a pretty normal weekend. There was couch snuggling (by which I mean snuggling on the couch, not actually snuggling the couch….though I’m not really opposed to that, either) and reading (finished Searching for Whitopia by Rich Benjamin and am thoroughly enjoying Dear American Airlines by Jonathan Miles), and we watched Inglourious Basterds this afternoon. Hubby’s in a bit of withdrawal from the lack of football on TV, and the hound has spent the day bounding through the snow, and there’s really nothing else worth writing home about.
Coming this week will be a wrap-up of my January reading, reviews of Searching for Whitopia and Dear American Airlines, some fun chat about the Book Blogger Convention, and who knows what else. I’m flying by the seat of my pants here, people.
What did you do this weekend? Were you snowed in, too?
I’ve known Paul McQuiston since my family moved to Kansas City in 1991 and began attending the same church his family attended. We were in second grade then, and by the time we were in sixth grade, I had a huge crush on him, and as far as I’m aware, this is the first he’s hearing of it. (Or he’s about to tell me he knew all along and was kind enough to pretend he didn’t…but it’s okay, I know 11-15 weren’t my best years.) I can confess to this now because I’m married and Paul has a beautiful girlfriend (I know this thanks to Facebook), and these things are funny this many years later. Right? Bueller?
Anyway, Paul and I lost touch in middle school, around the time it stopped being cool to attend youth group functions, and we just reconnected on Facebook within the last year or so. Gotta love that social networking. I’ve been thinking a lot about Howard Zinn’s death and the amazing legacy he’s left us, but I couldn’t quite find the way to write about it. Then I saw Paul say this on his blog: This man changed the way I thought about history. If I have a career in this field, it will be because of him.”
And a guest post was born.
Paul is currently pursuing a Master of Arts degree in European History, and I’m thrilled to be sharing this young historian’s reflections on a man who changed the way we all think about history.
Ambitious and stubborn, the man’s influence on what popular history could represent continues to be felt everyday through works from authors such as Mark Kurlansky ( Salt, Cod, etc.). Zinn’s most popular work, A People’s History of the United States, sold millions of copies, went through dozens of reprints and adaptations into other media as varied as graphic novels and movies.
But this isn’t about his works as an author. It is what his work represents for both the historical community and to society at large.
Zinn belonged to the historical school that came out of the Second World War that turned their attention away from the great, imposing, untouchable figures which loom so large in the popular history of the United States and the world. These historians, many of whom were first-generation college attendees and came from the working class, instead focused on the people from which they came. Students coming from the working class, made up of the children of immigrants and minorities, did not care to learn about the Great Men they learned about in primary school. They wanted to learn about those who shared their background and with whom they could relate.
Zinn, the son of Jewish immigrants who moved to Brooklyn, believed that those people oppressed throughout history deserved their own time in the spotlight. Beginning with the landing of Columbus in the fifteenth century, leading up to the modern day, Zinn showed how the policies of first the European colonialists and latterly the American government discriminated against, and sometimes completely wiped out the native people of North America. Published in 1980, People’s History presented the first popular, general history of the injustices of the American empire. For many people, the book opened their eyes that what they learned in school represented half the story of America’s greatness.
I am of two minds in regards to Zinn. As a reader, his writing style comes across fluidly without flair. That is to say that he lets his facts carry the story, something most scholarly historians fail to achieve. Given the subject material, this is the easiest, yet most appropriate method. His words are enjoyable to read, even if the disheartening facts he related were not.
I am not looking at Zinn’s work as only a reader, however. I am in the midst of postgraduate work in history and my master’s thesis. One of the earliest ideas taught to myself and my fellow graduate students was to identify whether an author was making a valid argument and what bias their argument belied. This was done by examining the sources used and the language used.
With Zinn his bias is so obvious, so blatant that is difficult to take People’s History as a serious work of scholarship, even if the source material is accurate. In the past few days I have read many who complained that he focused too much on the negative aspects, ignoring the positive contributions to society that the European and American policy makers made. This argument is hardly new and other scholars have defended Zinn’s approach with the logic that objective argumentation favored those in power more than the oppressed in scholarly discourse.
It’s the idea of what Zinn’s work represented, however, and not the work and its scholarly strengths and weaknesses that inspired me. After reading some of Zinn’s work, my beliefs on history and its telling changed dramatically. Zinn caused me to change my own scholarly focus. Even if I am drawn more to academic (read: dry/boring) history than its popular (and very necessary) counterpart, the idea that that history can give voice to those unheard before that Zinn helped bring to light remains powerful.
Zinn remained outspoken throughout the rest of his life, crying out against what he deemed injustices by those people who held power. My relationship as a reader with Zinn remains complicated. As a figure and an idea, he will remain inspirational. As a (hopeful) scholarly historian, his contribution and methods will continue to be murky to me. As a member of the vanguard which widened the scope of historical study, his impact continues to be felt and will continue to do so in the future. With (and perhaps because of) the imperfect nature of Zinn’s impact on me, his loss caused me deep sadness. But I know that whatever future course my own career takes, Zinn’s work and ideas will continue to inspire me to give voice to the previously silent.
Thanks to Paul McQuiston, historian extraordinaire to be, for sharing these thoughts. Please make him feel welcome with your own comments and reflections (and help me make up for potentially embarrassing him with my adolescent confession!), visit him on his newly minted Tumblr blog for all things literary, or say hi to him on Twitter.
January is almost over, and I’ve just started to feel as though I’ve recovered from the holidays. The process of getting here has left me with that special mid-winter variety of brain drain that makes me want to read a lot and do very little else. And now, with snowpocalypse 2.0 on the horizon, there is a very real chance that I’ll spend the next several days curled up with a book. Nothing to complain about there, but the growing pile of books to be reviewed makes me antsy. So here’s what I’ve been reading lately.
I read this for the LOST Books Challenge, and I have to say it was very interesting to revisit a story that I seem to have learned by heart without ever having read it. And the whole thing begins with Alice declaring that she is bored and uninterested in the book she’s been given to read because “What is the use of a book…without pictures or conversations?”
You know the story, too. Alice falls down the rabbit hole, finds a bottle marked “drink me,” and proceeds to grow and shrink and almost drown in a pool of her own tears, then she unlocks a little door and walks right into Wonderland. There’s the mad hatter whose clock is stuck at tea time and the caterpillar who makes her recite poems that she can’t seem to get right and the cheshire cat with his riddles and the queen whose response to just about everything is “Off with her head!”
Since I’m addicted to introductory material, notes, and bookish extras, the best part of revisiting this story was learning more about Lewis Carroll (whose real name was Charles Lutwidge Dodgson) and the deeper themes of this work inspired by his relationship with ten-year-old Alice Liddell and her sisters. Though the introduction to this Barnes & Noble classics edition describes Dodgson’s relationship with the girls as “by all accounts innocent and kindly,” it also notes that Dodgson was barred from the Liddell household before Alice’s story was even completed. Definitely makes you wonder if something dodgy were going on.
Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland is an allegory for growing up and a snapshot of the nineteenth-century tendency to “disregard disorder and chaos as problems to be tucked away in regressive moments of dreaming and remembering,” and I enjoyed the opportunity to read this story for what lies beneath its surface. And the LOST tie-in felt obvious: just as Alice stumbles through Wonderland trying to impose order on chaos and make sense of her encounters with nonsensical characters, so the survivors of Oceanic flight 815 struggle to do the same on their mysterious island. See Lostpedia for more of the direct literary tie-ins.
Blame it on Nathaniel Hawthorne and that fantastic Jonathan Edwards sermon “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God,” but I just can’t help loving the Puritans. That’s right. Loving them. I am fascinated by these people who were so convinced they were God’s chosen that they left their families and communities for what can only be described as a harrowing journey across the Atlantic to a new world of unknowns. Sure, they also believed this destiny entitled them to kill the natives, take the land, and impose their religious beliefs, but doesn’t that make them interesting?
This was my first time reading Sarah Vowell, and it was pretty much love from page one. Focusing on John Cotton, John Winthrop (author of the famous exhortation to be “as a city upon a hill”), and the social, political, and religious motivations of the people who founded America, Vowell brings to light the petty arguments, deeply felt convictions, complex relationships, and community values that, whether we acknowledge it or not, continue to form the basis of our society today. And yes, Vowell has her own political agenda here, occasionally pointing out that the things that make the Puritans sound crazy are not so different from the things that motivate members of other exremist religious groups to attack and criticize America today.
The post-9/11 context gives The Wordy Shipmates added depth, and Vowell presents her research and her just-subtle-enough jabs with a snappy pace and a hefty portion of snark. But the book is really all about the story behind the story, the seldom told history of the people who came after the Mayflower, and the complexities of their inner lives and their relationships with each other. The blurb on the back of The Wordy Shipmates calls Vowell’s Puritans “highly literatate, deeply principled, and surprisingly feisty,” and that sums it up nicely. The story is so interesting, in fact, that I didn’t even notice it is written as one long piece—no chapter divisions here—with just the occasional paragraph break.
I finished this book a week ago, and I’ve been trying to find a way to write about it ever since. My first experience with Amy Bloom has left me flummoxed and rendered me inarticulate. The stories in this collection are crafted so beautifully and packed with such emotional power that I am just in awe. But I’m going to try to talk about them because how else will I convince you to READ THIS BOOK NOW!
Where the God of Loves Hangs Out is comprised of twelve short stories, but it’s really more like two novellas plus four stand-alone stories. The first four stories of the collection present William and Clare, best friends who are married to other people but embark on a romantic relationship that will define the final chapter of their lives. Bloom alternates between Clare’s narrative voice in the first story “Your Borders, Your Rivers, Your Tiny Villages” and close third-person for the remaining three and paints a remarkably full picture of these two people and their families and the larger narrative of their lives at four distinct moments.
This section is followed by two stand-alone stories that I remember enjoying but that I didn’t find nearly as compelling as the William and Clare pieces. Then comes a four-story block about Julia and Lionel, a middle-aged woman and her stepson, who sleep together the day after Lionel’s father’s funeral and spend the rest of their lives trying to make amends for the mistake and repair their relationship. Bloom shows deft narrative skill in writing stories from Julia’s perspective, Lionel’s perspective, and close third-person, and I could not turn away from Julia and Lionel’s struggle to navigate the complex and long-lasting effects of one moment of confusing, desperate sadness.
What have you been reading lately?
Hey, FTC: I received a copy of Where the God of Love Hangs Out from LibraryThing Early Reviewers
On a warm spring day last April, I sat on my back porch, soaking up the rays, and plunged headfirst into a story surrounded by snow, ice, and the harsh Wisconsin winter. That story was Robert Goolrick’s A Reliable Wife, and I loved it.
Next Monday, February 1st, Fountain Bookstore (with a little help from yours truly) will kick off their #FountainReads Twitter Book Club with a discussion of A Reliable Wife beginning at 6pm EST. All are welcome to participate (whether you live in Richmond and shop at Fountain or not) by following the #fountainreads hashtag. I recommend using Tweetchat so you won’t have to dig through your Twitter stream to follow the discussion.
(For the uninitiated: go to www.tweetchat.com, sign in with your Twitter username and password, and enter fountainreads into the hashtag search box. You’ll be redirected to a page that shows you every tweet using the #fountainreads tag, so you can follow the conversation without having to follow all of the participants. But you’ll probably want to go ahead and follow the moderator @rvabookchik [Kelly Justice, owner of Fountain Bookstore] and @fountainbkstore for official store news and announcements. As a bonus, Tweetchat inserts the hashtag for you, so you don’t have to remember every time you respond.)
Win a personalized, signed copy of A RELIABLE WIFE
Author Robert Goolrick will appear at Fountain Bookstore on Thursday, February 11th at 6:30pm, and I can hardly contain my excitement. I have an extra copy of A Reliable Wife with its snazzy new cover to give away, courtesy of the publisher. One lucky winner will receive a paperback edition of A Reliable Wife signed with the message of his or her choice.
Here’s how to enter:
The action in A Reliable Wife begins when main character Ralph Truitt places the following personal ad:
“Country businessman seeks reliable wife. Compelled by practical, not romantic reasons.”
So tell me: if you were to place such an ad, what would it say?
Entries must be 25 words or fewer. Entries that do not answer the contest question will be excluded.
Open to residents of the U.S. and Canada only.
Contest closes next Friday, February 5th, at 11:59pm EST.